Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Popular Discussions - SAP ERP Financials - Financial Supply Chain Management
Viewing all 298 articles
Browse latest View live

Dispute Management - Correspondence with additional attachments

$
0
0

All

 

I'm using Post Processing Framework (PPF) for Dispute Management to output email correspondence via Smartforms.

 

The main correspondence is attached as a PDF, but I would also like to attach other business documents to the email as attachments. These additional documents are all archived PDFs and I know how to fetch them etc.

 

My problem is how to attach the additional business documents to the correspondence so it all goes out in one single email. I know that there is BAdI method COMPLETE_PROC_PPF~complete_send, which I could use to add an attachment, but problem here is that this exit kicks in too early, as the user hasn't chosen the action (correspondence) yet. Each action triggers a different Smartform, which requires different attachments.

 

Other BAdIs such as EXEC_METHODCALL_PPF do not have the send request (parameter IO_SEND) in the signature, which I need to attach further documents via class interface CL_DOCUMENTS_BCS->add_attachment.

 

I've looked through the PPF Guidelines document and the 6.20/6.40 PPF Implementation guide and spotted a MERGE function for actions, but can't find more information on it. Has anyone used it successfully to merge actions? Would it be possible to declare my other business documents as further actions and then merge them into one correspondence message?

 

Last resort would obviously be to use the PERSONALIZE_DOCUMENT method of the PPF to do an old-fashioned call of FM  SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1 and then prevent any further triggering by the PPF itself. I don't really like this solution, as it defeats the whole object of having a framework and am wondering if I'm overlooking something here.

 

Has anyone else had this problem of attaching additional business documents to PPF email correspondence? By the way, everything has to be sent in ONE email message. I don't want to send out separate emails for each attachment.

 

Kind regards,

Michael

 

Edited by: Michael Koch (UK) on Apr 21, 2011 6:00 PM

 

Edited by: Michael Koch (UK) on Apr 21, 2011 6:02 PM


Sales Order credit check

$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

I'm new to FSCM. My requirement is that I have to implement the BADI UKM_CHECK_STEP so that a Sales Order is blocked when the Payment Term has value 'XXXX' even if the customer has sufficient available credit limit. Can anybody please suggest me how to do it? Do I have to create any credit rule? if yes, how?

 

Thanks in advance,

Sarif

Re: Closed workitems in UDM_SUPERVISOR

$
0
0

Hi

May i ask you how to enable option of display closed entries in collection work list?

 

Regards

Mahmoud El nady

Version XXXX of collection strategy XXXX does not exist

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I'm trying to generate work list through UDM_GENWL, but I'm getting error message that Version XXXX of collection strategy XXXX does not exist. It did not generate worklist for any customer. On the contrary, it gives above error message for each business partner.

 

Will appreciate if someone can shed some light on solution.

 

Thanks,

Nirav

Screen variants in FB50, FB60

$
0
0

Previously, users had the ability to change their screen variants or lay-outs by accessing this icon that looked like an excel spreadsheet. This icon was situated on the right hand upper corner of the line entry of the screen.  This is now gone and although I have read that these lay-outs can be created through SPRO, we do not grant access to SPRO by our end-users and would like them to create their own screen variants.  Can someone help me with this?

BCM - Different approvals for the same limit

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

I am configuring BCM for my client and we have an scenario that the approvers are different for the vendor payments and bank to bank transfers for the same limit. For eg: The approvers for vendor payments are Mr. 'X', 'Y' and 'Z' for the limit 0 to 1 Million USD where as the approvers for the Bank to Bank transfer are Mr. 'A', 'B' and 'C' for the limit 0 to 1 Million.

 

Here I have created 2 rule id's, one for vendor payments and other for bank to bank transfer. The rule id's was created based on the Payment methods.

 

In 'Assign Roles to Release step' where we will assign who the approver is, here I can assign the signatories only based on the amount limit

 

How can we differentiate the signatories for the same limit. I can see some functionality called priority. I have tried given the priority but it is not working fine. Please advice.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Best Regards

 

Binoy

Closed workitems in UDM_SUPERVISOR

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

For how long are closed workitems maintained for visualization in transaction UDM_SUPERVISOR (After you enable the option display closed entries)?

 

Thanks!

 

M.

Payment Method Table

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Please let me know in which table the payment methods stored.

 

Thanks in advance.


Error While creating BP - ABAP

$
0
0

Dear Expert

I tested on Sandbox how to create the BP automatically while creating  customer from specific account group.. but after while i transport the request to QAS i face this error..

 

while i used another account group with same steps , no error happen

 

Runtime Errors MESSAGE_TYPE_X_TEXT

Date and Time 06.11.2015 09:16:41

Short dump has not been completely stored (too big)

Short text

The running application consciously caused an abort with short dump.

What happened?

An abnormal situation was detected in the running application program.

Therefore, a termination with short dump was consciously triggered using

the language element MESSAGE (type X).

Error analysis

Short text of the error message:

" "

Trigger Location of Runtime Error

Program MDS_CTRL_STRATEGY=============CP

Include MDS_CTRL_STRATEGY=============CM004

Row 120

Module type (METHOD)

Module Name SYNCHRONIZE

Source Code Extract

Line SourceCde

90 message x898.

91 endif.

92

93

94 call method gr_ppo_order_creation->create_order

95 EXPORTING

96 is_error = ls_error.

97

98 *To avoid that errors are stored twice in PPO-orders AND

99 *if error is logged in PPO-order program continues normally without further error indication

100 clear ls_error.

101

102 when ' '.

103 "Postprocessing Office is not active -> this leads to an intended dump.

104 clear ls_message.

105 LOOP AT ls_error-messages INTO ls_message

106 WHERE type CA 'EAX'.

107 * Short Dump MESSAGE x010.

108 MESSAGE ID ls_message-id

109 TYPE 'X'

110 NUMBER ls_message-number

111 WITH ls_message-message_v1

112 ls_message-message_v2

113 ls_message-message_v3

114 ls_message-message_v4.

115 ENDLOOP.

116 * PPO is not active ; maintain it in the customizing tables.

117 IF ls_message is initial.

Runtime Errors MESSAGE_TYPE_X_TEXT

Date and Time 06.11.2015 09:16:41

Short dump has not been completely stored (too big)

118 * MESSAGE x010.

119 CONCATENATE text-001 text-002 INTO lv_text SEPARATED BY space.

>>>>> MESSAGE lv_text TYPE 'X'.

121 ENDIF.

122

123 "If dump occours here, have a look at the content of the structure LS_ERROR

124 "in the debugger for error messages causing the error.

125 "Hint: This is a quite complex data structure, so you might have to navigate dow

126 "some levels in the structure to find the relevant error messages.

127

128 when others.

129 message x899.

130 endcase.

131

132 when others.

133 "do nothing

134

135 endcase.

136

137 endloop.

138

 

Regards

Mahmoud EL nady

chart of accounts

$
0
0

Hi experts,

iam new in sap iam having some doubts against chart of accounts

 

1.how many types of chart of accounts in sap fi/co?

2.what is the difference between those types?

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

chakri

Release object does not exist for batch Message no. BNK_UTIL004

$
0
0

Hi all,

 

Release object does not exist for batch Message no. BNK_UTIL004

 

I am getting the above error in Bank Communication Management whenever I check the approver list for a payment batch. The workflow isn't starting as the "Change and Release" verifier isn't getting any item in his box.

 

Please note that the BCM configuration has been properly setup as it was working well with workflows going to appropriate agents just a week ago. I believe something has gone wrong which may not pertain to BCM configuration but SAP business workflow.

 

Please help if you have the solution to this or have encountered it before. Thanks

IHC error 1P157 when executing IHC1IP

$
0
0

hello,

 

We are implementing IHC at our client. We are trying to create a payment order in transaction IHC1IP manually. But when we save it does not get posted but parks due to the error below:

 

BCA - Transaction type 'Bank Transfer' +/- sign does not concur with legacy system.

 

Can anyone let me know how to resolve this?

 

We are also having issues with inbound idocs for partner type LS when we are executing internal payments via F110.

 

our scenario is as below:

 

1) one bank area for ihc center

2) ihc center has been assigned as house banks in the subsidiaries.

3) payment method created for internal payments.

4) current accounts have been created in the bank area for subsidiaries with product IHC Max.

5) f110 generates idoc for partner type B but LS throws errors saying creation of header failed and no valid clearing partner.

6) we have not defined clearing partner

7) BCA trans type we are using is INTPAY

8) payment order trans type is 0150.

 

my understaning was we need clearing partner only when we do central external payments or between bank areas.

 

Please advise.

 

 

Thanks,

Raj

Re: Closed workitems in UDM_SUPERVISOR

$
0
0

Hi

May i ask you how to enable option of display closed entries in collection work list?

 

Regards

Mahmoud El nady

Screen variants in FB50, FB60

$
0
0

Previously, users had the ability to change their screen variants or lay-outs by accessing this icon that looked like an excel spreadsheet. This icon was situated on the right hand upper corner of the line entry of the screen.  This is now gone and although I have read that these lay-outs can be created through SPRO, we do not grant access to SPRO by our end-users and would like them to create their own screen variants.  Can someone help me with this?

Automatic Credit Segment assignment in SAP FSCM Credit management from XD01

$
0
0

Hi,

 

When I am creating a customer from XD01, its not creating a Credit segment assignment automatically. I looked in table UKMBP_CMS_SGM and transaction n UKM_BP Credit Segmant tab  for  that Business Partner. There is no data. I am debugging this issue. But no idea What BADI's or Functionality will trigger this process. Only this BADI triggering from XD01 creation UKM_R3_ACTIVATE, but not big help.

 

I appreciate your help...

 

 

Thanks,

Monica


SAP Dispute Management for vendors

$
0
0

Good  day Colleagues

 

We are currently investigating the option of using the functionality of SAP Dispute Management for accounts receivables for vendors. We noticed that on SAP FSCM, the dispute management for customers comes as standard. Can we use this functionality for vendors? What configuration or development is involved to make this work for vendors? How much efforts in terms of hours (roughly) is required to make this work?

 

regards

Khetha Majozi

Add attachment icon to Invoices tab in udm_supervisor

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have a new requirement, that is Adding Attachment Icon to Invoices Tab in UDM_SUPERVISOR T-code, currently this function is available in Notes Tab,

 

can you please advise BADI for this requirement if you know.

 

Thanks for Your Help!

Mahesh

Link between UDM_COLL_ITEM and UDM_WL_ITEM

$
0
0

Hi experts,

 

Where is the link between the between UDM_COLL_ITEM and UDM_WL_ITEM? is this hold in a table? or a funcion module that would give the relation?

 

Thanks!

 

M.

Custom program to insert documents in existing dispute case

$
0
0

Hi there,

 

Were developing a program to automatically create dispute cases with a more flexible and dynamic selection criteria than the one that is available per standard program. So far, it's running fine. However, our client requirement is also to assign documents to already existing dispute cases instead of creating a new one (as similiar to FBL5N that allows to see that a case to a customer is already open and you can assign documents to an existing case).
This happens as our client has lots of credit memos that are not cleared against invoices when registered (due to several business requirements) so existing cases do never get updated with net values. Our client wants to add them after the case is created. SAP stated the solution would be to cancel the case and create a new one with every document but as you may imagine our client has hundred of documents and few technicians and also because cases already have an important log and history to keep so that scenario is not applicable.

 

Did anybody face similar issue? Did you get to find which function modules should be used? Our go live date is near as our implementation phase ends at the end of the mond, so any help is appreciated.

 

Thanks in advance,

Andreia Vilas Boas

Financial Transaction is reversed by mistake in FTR_EDIT

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

As i could not find a proper method of recovery for the problem i am posting it here.Financial Trans in FSCM is reversed by mistake by the user through FTR_EDIT & the status shows 'reversed'.

Is there a recovery method to bring it back to the normal status like re-reverse it?

Kindly suggest some recovery methods for this problem.

 

Regards

Andrew

Viewing all 298 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>