Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Popular Discussions - SAP ERP Financials - Financial Supply Chain Management
Viewing all 298 articles
Browse latest View live

Spanish tax report S_ALR_87012403, customer data missing in the file

$
0
0

Hello,

I am running tax report s_alr_87012403 report and the file is created but customer data doesnt appear in the file created.

The vendors appear correctly and with all the information but the lines related to the customers are mainly blank

Could you please help us with this issue?

Thanks!


Disputed objects - Anchors

$
0
0

Hello,

 

Does anyone know how the system classifies each document in the creation of dispute cases?  Each disputed object can be associated to the dispute dossier anchors DISP_RES, DISP_INV, DISP_CRED and DISP_PAY. For the documents sample that we have tested we have realized that:

     - Debit documents are assigned to DISP_INV

     - Credit documents with posting key set in customizing (OB41) as payment transaction are assigned to anchor DISP_PAY

     - Credit documents with posting key not set as payment transaction are assigned to anchor DISP_CRED

 

We have not been able to create any case with documents associated to anchor DISP_RES as documents posted as residual items are associated to the anchor according to what we have mentioned above. Do you know any situation where documents are considered as DISP_RES?

 

Are our conclusions correct? Do you know of any way to automatically know to each anchor will a document be assigned to?

 

Thanks in advance,

Margarida Magalhãrs

Getting Msg: Error when calling Credit Management: Technical Error

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

While creation of sales order in ECC, i am getting a message "Error when calling Credit Management: Technical Error"

Can you help me in this case

 

Regards,

Satish

Collections with Head Office/Branch

$
0
0

My company has a large customer base (over 1M customer master recs). When we went live on SAP we didn't use the standard tools for grouping customers like Head Office/Branch and now are interested in creating these relationships especially because collections management recognizes the head office/branch. The question is...Can this be set up after been live on SAP for a few years ? It seems that when I test this functionality, the existing open items don't adjust to the head office , only new postings recognize the relationship. Does this require some kind of data conversion to get existing open items to know the head office/branch relationships ? Anyone with experience on setting up Head Office with Collections and can attest to the pros and cons ? Are there other grouping constructs that can be used that will flow to Collections Mngmt ? Thanks for your input !

Cost Element Planning

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Could you please explain me what is the importance of Cost element planning in KP06. How it is useful for the organization. Can you tell me what are

the configuration steps behind this Cost element planning.

 

Regards,

Krishna.

Cannot pull customer in UDM_Specialist

$
0
0

Hi ,

 

We have an issue where we are not able to see Business Partner in our UDM_SPECIALIST report. It gives a message "Business Partner was not translated to a customer "  though both Customer and BP already exist.

 

 

Thanks,

Mohammed Ziauddin

Disputed objects - Anchors

$
0
0

Hello,

 

Does anyone know how the system classifies each document in the creation of dispute cases?  Each disputed object can be associated to the dispute dossier anchors DISP_RES, DISP_INV, DISP_CRED and DISP_PAY. For the documents sample that we have tested we have realized that:

     - Debit documents are assigned to DISP_INV

     - Credit documents with posting key set in customizing (OB41) as payment transaction are assigned to anchor DISP_PAY

     - Credit documents with posting key not set as payment transaction are assigned to anchor DISP_CRED

 

We have not been able to create any case with documents associated to anchor DISP_RES as documents posted as residual items are associated to the anchor according to what we have mentioned above. Do you know any situation where documents are considered as DISP_RES?

 

Are our conclusions correct? Do you know of any way to automatically know to each anchor will a document be assigned to?

 

Thanks in advance,

Margarida Magalhãrs

Custom Email body for Correspondence output

$
0
0

All,

 

We are sending out emails with correspondence output (from Smartform) fine, but I can't seem to find a way to change the body of the correspondence email (right now it's just blank)? Does anybody know how to do this?

 

Regards,

M


Error adding object NL7099330024272015001 (type BSEG, anchor CDIS_INV, relationship F6)

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We have extended dispute mgmt functionality to some new company codes as a part of our roll-out project . Everything else is working fine in dispute management besides in our test system when we try to create a dispute case from collection work list & I am getting above mentioned error for new & old company codes now though normal dispute case is happening via FBL5N .

 

I have seen the answer for this query in some SCN questions already but that doesn't seem to be the case here. I would also like to tell here that this is working fine in Production system for old company codes & case type configuration is same in development , test & production systems.

 

Any suggestions/solutions are welcome at this stage .

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Regards

Ramneek kumar

Old Open items (October 2015) not appearing in UDM_SPECIALIST

$
0
0

Hello,

 

When simulating UDM_STRATEGY for BP 123456, I am getting the below message.

 

Collection rule ZR00000001 does not apply.

(Here 2 rules are set Collection Rule: ZR00000001 = Risk Category TPC , TPR , TP1 , CTP (Valuation Points 0, Exit Rule Indicator Checked))

                              Collection Rule: ZR00000001 = Risk Category BKR , REI , CAA , RAO (Valuation Points 60, Exit Rule Indicator Not Checked))

 

No worklist items created since exit rule CR00000008 applies

(Here CR00000008 = Amount to be collected between 9.999.999,00- and 500,00 USD, (Valuation Points 0, Exit Rule Indicator Checked)

 

No worklist items created since no rules apply

 

Business partner has no priority according to strategy Z_ABC_CORP

 

I executed, FDM_COLL_SEND01 and it shows 4 items sent as there were 4 open items. 1 overdue and other 3 not due.

The open item is overdue with amount 676.25 USD for this BP). The Credit management master data states: Risk Category as REI)


Need help on this to understand why is the system not showing in UDM_SPECIALIST. I have attached the All Rules.txt file for ready reference. Thanks in advance.

Daily payment as per customer and vendor report

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

My client requirement is to develop a report for daily payment both cash and bank against customer & vendor invoice. Is there any standard t.code is available in sap by which i could achieve the requirement or in case of a z report which table should i consider for the above requirement.

 

 

 

Regards

Abhisekh Mandal

Screen variant is not pulled

$
0
0

Hi all

I created a transction variants for FB50 as you can see on the picture

1.PNG

And set as default for all users

2.PNG

But not all users get the screen variants ZFB50 on several. Why?

 

Thanks so much.

Division wise credit management through FSCM

$
0
0

Hi

 

Is it possible to have division wise credit management using FSCM. We have one company code under this there are multiple division. we would like to have credit controls division specific?

 

Pls. help

 

Thanks

Process receivables screen enhancement button for T-code - F150

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have a requirement in FSCM Transaction: UDM_SUPERVISOR, in Process Receivable screen we want to enhance with a button with T-Code: F150. And after having the button for Transaction F150 in Process Receivable screen the system should auto populate dunning parameters as well. Process Receivable screen as below:


Looking for solution on how can we add F150 button. Looking for experts advice ASAP.



Regards,

Mukesh Sharma


 

Error adding object NL7099330024272015001 (type BSEG, anchor CDIS_INV, relationship F6)

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We have extended dispute mgmt functionality to some new company codes as a part of our roll-out project . Everything else is working fine in dispute management besides in our test system when we try to create a dispute case from collection work list & I am getting above mentioned error for new & old company codes now though normal dispute case is happening via FBL5N .

 

I have seen the answer for this query in some SCN questions already but that doesn't seem to be the case here. I would also like to tell here that this is working fine in Production system for old company codes & case type configuration is same in development , test & production systems.

 

Any suggestions/solutions are welcome at this stage .

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Regards

Ramneek kumar


How to get the GRN no in FBL1N report

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Please help me to get the MBLNR field in FBL1N report against the MIRO documents "RE" means my client required to get "WE" material doc no. against the RE doc no. in FBL1N report.

 

Regards

Abhisekh Mandal

Money Market Third party configuration

$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

Need your help very urgently.

 

I am configuring Deposit at notice ( Product type : 52A) for (external loan) i.e. Third party loan configuration.

 

I have configured the below points:

*Product Types

*Transaction Types

-Define Number Ranges

-Define Transaction Types

*Assign General Valuation Class

*Assign Accounting Codes and Valuation Areas

*Define Account Assignment Reference Determination (OTC Transactions)

*Define Account Determination

 

Yet i am getting following errors

 

* Recording position management: Error during distribution (co.code)

* Error occurred in derivation rule.

* Error in update accounting

Capture.PNG

Awaiting for the earliest assistance.

Thanks & regards,

Surabhi

Payment Method Table

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Please let me know in which table the payment methods stored.

 

Thanks in advance.

Screen variant is not pulled

$
0
0

Hi all

I created a transction variants for FB50 as you can see on the picture

1.PNG

And set as default for all users

2.PNG

But not all users get the screen variants ZFB50 on several. Why?

 

Thanks so much.

SAP IHC - payext inbound idoc

$
0
0

Hi,

 

i am  implementing IHC at my client and trying to test internal payment. the scenario worked perfectly fine in Dev system. we did the exact same configuration in QA system but for some reason inbound idoc for PAYEXT is not generated. When i process the idoc in we19  it creates the idoc with an error that the receiver port is invalid. I checked the port and it looks fine. I have the same error in Dev system as well but the idoc is created successfully and creates a payment order. Any thoughts are highly appreciated.

 

thanks

raj

Viewing all 298 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>